All Forums  FastFieldSolvers  E.M. Workbench  FastHenry and FasterCap Integration

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize: 640 x 480 800 x 600 1024 x 768 1280 x 1024 UserName: Password: Antispam question: What do MOONwalk and MOONdance have in common? Answer: Format Mode: Basic  Help  Prompt  Format: Font Andale Mono Arial Arial Black Book Antiqua Century Gothic Comic Sans MS Courier New Georgia Impact Lucida Console Script MT Bold Stencil Tahoma Times New Roman Trebuchet MS Verdana   Size 1 2 3 4 5 6   Color Black Red Yellow Pink Green Orange Purple Blue Beige Brown Teal Navy Maroon LimeGreen Message: * HTML is OFF * Forum Code is ON [quote][i]Originally posted by Enrico[/i] [br]Reporting here the main point of our offline discussion, for completeness of the thread: The point here is that trying merging the outputs from FastHenry and of FastCap/FasterCap is not the best way to proceed - even when not considering the different input file formats. You need a valid circuit model to fit the results of your separate simulations to. In this case, the physical geometry of the problem may help you - e.g. for a PCB printed coil on two faces of the PCB, an pi-greek model L-C-L may be a good fit - however this is difficult to do in general. You may be better off using a tool that directly provides you the impedance of the system in the EMQS approximation (or full-wave, if radiation is of concern). In this respect, FastImp is a tool better suited to the purpose. One of the limits of FastImp however is that it works in homogeneous dielectric, but you may assume an equivalent medium permittivity. As of today FastImp is not supported in the E.M. Workbench, but it would be nice to have some sponsorship to cover it as well. Cheers, Enrico [/quote]   Check here to include your profile signature.