FastFieldSolvers Forum
FastFieldSolvers Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 FastFieldSolvers
 FasterCap and FastCap2
 Dielectric Interface

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Antispam question: What do MOONwalk and MOONdance have in common?
Answer:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON

 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Tommy Posted - Dec 05 2009 : 16:50:37
Hello Guys!

It would be great if you could help me out in this topic. What will happen if I specify the following dielectric interface:

D layer.txt 1 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0

inside layer.txt:
Q cond -1.0 -1.0 0.0 -1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 -1.0 0.0

How is this handeled? Shouldn't it be a must to specify a confined space? Or is everyting above the layer z=1 a relative permittivity of 1, in contrast to the rel. permittivity of 5 below the layer.


Also the following example is a mystery to me:
Imagine to Boxes with different permittivity directly connected. (for example a layer of silicon and a layer of oxide directly connected)
It is always stated in a D statement, that the inner and outer permittivity have a defined value. But now we have two D statements.

It makes sense to define an inner permittivity, since this is in a confined space. The specified outer permittivity of the silicon could collide with the outer permittivity of the oxide. Also the inner permittivity of the silicon can have a different value as the outer permittivity of the oxide.


If somebody could explain the topic to me I would be really happy.

FastFieldSolvers Forum © 2020 FastFieldSolvers S.R.L. Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06